Pilots At Risk, Flying Public In Imminent Danger

Catch every segment of the show at

Go Ad-Free, Get Exclusive Content, Become a Premium User.

Commercial pilots are being forced into wearing masks at all times. Without enough oxygen getting into their bloodstream, this poses a serious medical threat not only to the pilot, but to every single passenger onboard.

Bahig Soliba has been standing up for this fact, and refusing to wear a mask. This has resulted in thousands upon thousands of dollars in fines.

On Thursday, Soliba joined the Stew Peters Show to share his thoughts on this catastrophe in waiting.

“It is my opinion that having a mask on restricts the amount of oxygen that a pilot has in their blood system. As such, it impairs their functionality,” Bahig Soliba told Stew Peters. “Pilots have a pilot’s certificate, and they have a medical certificate, and a pilot’s certificate without a medical certificate is just an ornament. It means nothing.”

Hypoxia is a big issue here. You can’t always see it, but it can cause pilots to black out, maybe even at the controls. Any kind of oxygen restriction could even result in blood clots!

“Clots are obviously a very dangerous thing that can immediately and without notice incapacitate somebody, maybe on a final approach just a couple of hundred feet above a runway,” Stew told Bahig.

Bahig also said that if he ever stops resisting this mandate, and does not defend his own health and safety, he will be violating federal regulations. The regulation in question (FAR 61.53), was even printed on his T-shirt during the interview, and you can read it for yourself here.

Stew said that the flying public needs to be aware of this, and to notify pilots if you see them wearing a mask on the job.

“Just remind them of FAR 61.53 and let’em know that they are in violation of that… and that they need to be in compliance, and they need to take the mask off,” Stew Peters said Thursday.

Watch the full show on

Follow Stew on Gab.

Follow Red Voice Media on social media.

See all of Stew’s content at StewPeters.TV.

Watch full episodes here.

Check out Stew’s store.

Support our efforts to keep the truth alive.

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Red Voice Media. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary. Red Voice Media would like to make a point of clarification on why we do not refer to any shot related to COVID-19 as a “vaccine.” According to the CDC, the definition of a vaccine necessitates that said vaccine have a lasting effect of at least one year in preventing the contraction of the virus or disease it’s intended to fight. Because all of the COVID-19 shots thus far available have barely offered six months of protection, and even then not absolute, Red Voice Media has made the decision hereafter to no longer refer to the Pfizer, Moderna, or Johnson & Johnson substances as vaccinations.

What do you think?

Written by

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

State Department Spokesman Gets Into Heated Exchange With Reporter, Accuses Him of Believing Russia Over US

Watch: State Department Spokesman Gets Into Heated Exchange With Reporter, Accuses Him of Believing Russia Over US

Epoch Times Comes Up As Real News.

Laura Lynn Tears A Strip Into The Fake News.