🇺🇸@COVID19Up: Public health agencies are finally beginning to lose their control of information since the COVID-19 crisis started, playing defense in multiple lawsuits that have revealed substantial federal government involvement in social media censorship.
On September 6, a federal judge ordered Biden Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre and Dr. Fauci to respond to document requests in a First Amendment lawsuit alleging the feds coerced social media companies to censor and silence dissenting COVID-19 information, some of which even Fauci now acknowledges have merit.
Meanwhile, the Justice Department has continued resisting a “special grand jury” to investigate federal officials for decisions that “significantly compromise[d] the accuracy and integrity of COVID-related data.”
Oregon state Sens. Kim Thatcher and Dennis Linthicum and naturopath Henry Ealy went to court in March to compel the impaneling, alleging that statistical manipulation caused “a significant hyperinflation of COVID-19 case, hospitalization, and death counts” and $3.5 trillion in resulting fraudulent taxpayer expenditures.
And now, the CDC’s universal promotion of “updated” new “bivalent” COVID-19 booster injections, authorized by the FDA based in part on eight mice —including a White House plan to make the shots annual—are also facing headwinds from increasingly high-profile research on COVID-19 vaccine risk versus benefit.
The White House plan is “is not data-driven and ignores nat[ural] imm[unity] & concerns of immune imprinting from a multi-dose vax strategy,” Johns Hopkins University medical professor and National Academy of Medicine member Marty Makary tweeted.
Makary is a coauthor of a new preprint , not yet peer-reviewed, on the ethics of mandating COVID-19 boosters for young adults that was funded by the pro-COVID vaccine Wellcome Trust charitable foundation.