Bill Gates’ Lab-Grown Meat Exposed: ‘Really Gruesome’

Bill Gates’ Lab-Grown Meat Exposed: ‘Really Gruesome’

An international investigation has exposed the gruesome reality being the globalist push to flood the food supply with biotech products such as Bill Gates’ lab-grown “meats.”

Dutch investigative journalist Elze van Hamelen has published a new report to raise the alarm about the “tsunami of fake foods” being rolled out by the biotech industry.

Despite claims from the green agenda elite, fake meats are not about your health or the environment.

Van Hamelen warns that these products are a tool to phase out farmers and ranchers so the agriculture industry can be replaced with ultra-processed food products that can be controlled by patents.

Creating lab-grown meat is “insanely expensive,” van Hamelen notes.

The production of these “foods” is also plagued by bacterial and viral contamination.

Despite the pharmaceutical-style manufacturing, lab-grown meat isn’t considered a pharmaceutical product.

This means that no human testing is required.

Instead of directing your food dollars to corporate supermarket chains or fake food products, van Hamelen recommends supporting small farmers growing real food.

Lab-grown products may one day represent 80 percent or more of the “meat” consumed worldwide.

This shift would be a dramatic departure from the way humans have eaten for centuries.

Of course, this change in the food supply will only impact the general public as the wealthy elite will continue to eat traditional meat products.

Speaking with Catherine Austin Fitts of “The Solari Report,” van Hamelen reports on what the rollout of “fake foods” means for human health.

The Dutch government is among those investing heavily in lab-grown “meat.”

Those promoting fake meat, including leading advocate Bill Gates, insist that lab-grown “foods” are the solution to “save the planet” and end world hunger.

Gates is pressuring the governments of Western nations to ban meats and replace them entirely with his products, such as “synthetic beef.”

However, the products produced by Gates’s company, Upside Foods, are plagued by technological challenges that make them prohibitively expensive, prone to bacterial and viral contamination, and nearly impossible to grow at scale.

The push has been raising concerns about the true agenda behind the push to dominate the food supply with fake meat products.

As experts are warning, if government and corporate entities are able to take control of the food supply via fake food, they also control the people.

Meanwhile, van Hamelen is raising the alarm about the impact on public health that introducing such products would have.

To make fake meat, cell lines are taken from a living organism.

During production, they are then manipulated to grow quickly and consistently.

The cells used for fake meat production that proliferate quickly are from “either cancers or fetuses,” van Hamelen says.

“They have cells that proliferate very quickly.”

For lab-grown meats, biotech is cryptic about what types of cell lines are actually used.

Normally, cells grow in a structure in your body.

The cell lines being grown in bioreactors in labs are grown in a thin film or growth medium.

In the body, the growth medium is your blood.

Van Hamelen explains that this is a complex substance that laboratories try to replicate using fetal bovine serum (FBS) — blood taken from living calf fetuses.

“It’s really gruesome how this is harvested,” she says.

She points out that this method negates the narrative that lab-grown meats are made without animals.

FBS is often used to grow cultured cells because of the proteins and vitamins it contains.

2013 study stated, “In many common culture media, the sole source of micronutrients is fetal bovine serum (FBS).”

In 2020, lab-grown chicken made by U.S. startup Eat Just debuted in Singapore.

It marked the first “cultured meat” product to be sold at a restaurant.

It was produced using FBS.

To develop synthetic “blood,” precision fermentation, using genetically engineered (GE) microbes, is used.

This is along with artificial hormones, which can’t legally be added to food in the European Union.

Micronutrients and minerals must also be sourced, making the process “insanely expensive,” van Hamelen says.

The cost is so expensive that the use of an FBS-free medium may cause lab-grown “meat” to cost over $20,000 per kilogram.

A report from The Good Food Institute, a nonprofit group behind the alternative protein industry, suggested that if the cost of FBS-free mediums could be reduced, it would drive down the cost of fake meat by 90%.

This is unlikely, however.

“The report provides no evidence to explain why these micronutrient costs will fall,” Joe Fassler, The Counter’s deputy editor, wrote in an in-depth exposé about the actual science behind lab-grown meat.

In precision fermentation, GE microbes such as yeast and bacteria are fermented in brewery-style tanks under high-tech, sterile conditions.

Contamination must be controlled down to 2 parts per billion, van Hamelen says, “because as soon as there is a contamination … it becomes riddled with bacteria, and you don’t have a cell culture, you have a bacteria culture.”

The Good Food Institute’s report assumes that fake meat facilities of the future will be food-grade, as opposed to pharmaceutical-grade.

Being pharmaceutical-grade would increase costs even further.

But a report by chemical engineer David Humbird for Open Philanthropy found that lab-grown “meat” may remain too expensive to ever come to market.

This is due to the assumption that pharmaceutical-grade specifications and aseptic “clean rooms” would be necessary due to the slow growth rate of culture cells.

The slow growth rate of the cells makes them extremely vulnerable to contamination from bacteria and viruses.

Humbird told Fassler:

“Bacteria grow every 20 minutes, and the animal cells are stuck at 24 hours.

“You’re going to crush the culture in hours with a contamination event. …

“There are documented cases of, basically, operators getting the culture sick.

“Not even because the operator themselves had a cold.

“But there was a virus particle on a glove.

“Or not cleaned out of a line.

“The culture has no immune system.

“If there’s virus particles in there that can infect the cells, they will.

“And generally, the cells just die, and then there’s no product anymore.

“You just dump it.”

Paul Wood, a former pharmaceutical industry executive, added:

“We’re saying, guys, it has to be pharmaceutical-grade because the process is going to demand it.

“It’s not whether someone will allow you [to run at food-grade specs.]

“It’s just the fact you can’t physically do it.”

Adding to the issues, the human body has vessels that not only deliver nutrients to cells but also get rid of toxins.

In the fake meat growing process, there is no vessel system, so the culture starts to generate toxins, and there’s no way to get rid of them.

An exposé in Wired points to a number of the technological challenges that van Hamelen speaks of.

The outlet’s information comes directly from employees at Bill Gates’s Upside Foods, one of two companies allowed to sell fake meat in the U.S.

Wired reported:

One former employee says that between the factory opening in November 2021 and the summer of 2022, they saw dozens of attempts to use the bioreactors to produce sheets of tissue, but they rarely resulted in usable meat.

At times, production runs were ruined by contamination that meant the meat was unsuitable for turning into a product, the former employee says.

Former Upside employees describe how batches of meat growing in the custom-made bioreactors would frequently be ruined by contamination and have to be incinerated. ‘

“Once they had any indication it was contaminating, they would try to just stop the run, get the cells, and get any results out of it that they could,” says a former employee with knowledge of the process.

Meanwhile, despite the pharmaceutical-style manufacturing, lab-grown meat isn’t considered a pharmaceutical product, meaning human testing is not required.

“If this is brought to market, it’s a human experiment,” van Hamelen warns.

Van Hamelen also describes a war against Dutch farmers that has emerged, threatening to push them off the land they’ve farmed for generations.


As small and mid-sized farms close their doors, governments and corporate entities can scoop up the land, leaving consumers with no choice but to eat the fake lab-grown, animal-free foods they’re offering.

Van Hamelen discusses the agenda in an in-depth report and podcast for “The Solari Report” — “Dutch Farmers and Fishermen: The People Who Feed Us.”

“In 2021, the European Union’s Natura 2000 network released a map of areas in the Netherlands that are now protected against nitrogen emissions.

“Any Dutch farmer who operates their farm within 5 kilometers of a Natura 2000 protected area would now need to severely curtail their nitrogen output, which in turn would limit their production,” Roman Balmakov, Epoch Times reporter and host of “Facts Matter,” says.

Dutch dairy farmer Nynke Koopmans, with the Forum for Democracy, believes the nitrogen problem is made up.

“It’s one big lie,” she says.

“The nitrogen has nothing to do with environmental.

“It’s just getting rid of farmers.”

Another farmer said he’d have to reduce his herd of 58 milking cows down to six if new nitrogen rules go into effect,

Nitrogen scientist Jaap C. Hanekamp, Ph.D., was working for a government committee to study nitrogen, tasked with analyzing the government’s nitrogen model.

He told Balmakov:

“The whole policy is based on the deposition model about how to deal with nitrogen emissions on nature areas.

“And I looked at the validation studies and show that the model is actually crap.

“It doesn’t work. And doesn’t matter.

“They still continue using it.

“Which is, in a sense, unsettling.

“I mean, really, can we do such a thing in terms of policy? Use a model which doesn’t work?

“It’s never about innovation, it’s always about getting rid of farmers.”

Once you get rid of farmers, the only food choices left will be lab-grown products, insects, and other synthetic foods.

According to Fitts’ Solari Report:

“Synthetic food and lab-grown meat represent a new and dangerous chapter in what I call ‘the Great Poisoning.’

“Despite an economics that makes no sense — and clear indications that these products are repugnant to consumers — money is apparently no object.

“Staked by massive infusions of venture capital and burgeoning public-private partnerships, items like cricket flour and lab-cultured ‘eggs’ have already made their way into grocery stores — with non-existent or misleading labeling designed to get past unwary consumers’ defenses.

“As Elze’s research shows, this is a multipronged attack, with synthetic foods also targeting pets and livestock.

“There is every indication that governments, corporations, and others are serious about establishing a tightly controlled food system that replaces real food and real meat with synthetic, pharma-inspired ‘alternatives.’”

One way you can fight back, aside from supporting farmers producing real food using real farming, is to contact your representatives and encourage them to vote in favor of the Processing Revival and Intrastate Meat Exemption (PRIME) Act.

Introduced by Republican Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY), the PRIME Act would allow farmers to sell meat processed at smaller slaughtering facilities.

It would also allow states to set their own meat processing standards.

Small slaughterhouses are banned from selling their meat because they do not have an inspector on staff.

Only large facilities can easily fulfill such a requirement.

The PRIME Act would lift this regulation without sacrificing safety, as random U.S. Department of Agriculture inspections could still occur.

Ultimately, the PRIME Act would make meat much more affordable and available.

The answer to food safety and security lies in a decentralized food system that connects communities with farmers growing real food sustainably and distributing it locally.

Van Hamelen recommends directing your food dollars to small farmers or their intermediaries and away from corporate supermarket chains.

What do you think?

Written by colinnew

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Suzanne Anton B.C.'s ongoing vaccine mandates stand on a shaky legal foundation

Suzanne Anton: B.C.’s ongoing vaccine mandates stand on a shaky legal foundation

Top model who jumped to her death from her Wall St. apartment building had flown on Epstein’s jet as a teen court docs

Top model who jumped to her death from her Wall St. apartment building had flown on Epstein’s jet as a teen: court docs