Autoimmune Bullous Dermatosis Following COVID-19 Vaccination: A Series of Five Cases

Autoimmune Bullous Dermatosis Following COVID-19 Vaccination A Series of Five Cases
Autoimmune Bullous Dermatosis Following COVID-19 Vaccination A Series of Five Cases


Autoimmune bullous diseases (AIBDs) are a heterogeneous group of diseases that often manifest as cutaneous and mucosal vesicles, blisters, and erosions. The pathogenic mechanism behind the condition involves the presence of autoantibodies targeting desmosomes and hemidesmosomes. These structural proteins are targeted and are intraepidermal in pemphigus, causing the blisters to be superficial and fragile, while they are subepidermal in bullous pemphigoid (BP), leading to the formation of tense bullae. Several factors are known to trigger AIBD, including vaccines [1]. The World Health Organization declared Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as a global pandemic in March 2020, and millions of people have been affected by the disease worldwide. A vaccination campaign was launched in Morocco in January 2021, resulting in a notable increase in autoimmune diseases [2]. In this report, we discuss five cases of new-onset AIBD triggered by the COVID-19 vaccine, three of which had BP while the other two had pemphigus. In all five cases, the diagnosis was confirmed by pharmacovigilance investigations.

Case Presentation

Case 1

A 51-year-old man was admitted for the management of extensive bullous eruption, which had appeared seven days after the administration of the Oxford AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine’s first booster. He had no specific medical history and was not taking any other medications. The clinical examination showed the presence of diffuse tense bullae associated with urticarial plaques on the trunk, back, and legs; post-bullous erosions and cocarde-like lesions affecting 70% of the skin surface were observed. The Nikolsky sign was positive (Figure 1). The patient also had multiple erosions on the buccal mucosa (Figure 2).


Histological examination showed subepidermal split with a superficial perivascular inflammatory infiltrate and predominant eosinophils. Direct immunofluorescence detected tissue-bound autoantibodies with a linear C3 pattern at the basement membrane zone. The indirect immunofluorescence performed on salt-split normal human skin substrate with the patient’s serums detected circulating immunoglobulin G (IgG) (BP180 antibodies), consistent with BP. The remaining laboratory analyses yielded normal results, except for a high count of eosinophils. We notified the pharmacovigilance department and an immediate thorough investigation was started, which showed an I5B4 causality assessment score for the vaccine according to the French method of imputability [3]. The diagnosis of vaccine-induced BP was highly suspected. The patient was put on prednisone 30 mg daily (0.5 mg/kg daily) for six weeks, subsequently reduced by 5 mg every week, and then fully stopped. A complete resolution of the blisters was achieved after only four weeks of treatment.

Case 2

A 54-year-old woman presented with a one-week history of a widespread erythematous rash and blistering at the site of vaccination. She had received the first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine (Oxford AstraZeneca) administered into the left upper arm three days before the onset of the rash. She had been previously well with no specific medical history. The rash had begun at the injection site with small localized blisters. It had then spread from the left upper arm to the abdomen, back, and lower legs. Physical examination on admission revealed tense bullae associated with urticarial plaques on both arms, abdomen, and thighs, with a positive Nikolsky sign (Figure 3).


She also had erosions on the mouth palate. Histological examination showed subepidermal split with a superficial perivascular inflammatory infiltrate and predominant eosinophils. Both direct and indirect immunofluorescence were positive with linear IgG and C3, consistent with BP. Biological examinations revealed an eosinophil count of 2200/mm3. According to the previously cited pharmacovigilance protocol [3], the causality score assessment was I5B4 for the vaccine, highly suggestive of a diagnosis of vaccine-induced BP. The patient was put on topical corticosteroids with good evolution (clobetasol propionate 0.05%). The vaccine booster was not contraindicated but was refused by the patient.

Case 3

The patient was a 68-year-old man with a history of hypercholesterolemia for 20 years with no other particular personal or familial history. Two weeks after receiving the first dose of the Oxford AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine, he developed blisters at the vaccination site, which was initially misdiagnosed as post-traumatic lesions. Seven days after he received the vaccine booster, which had been administered within three weeks of the first dose, the symptoms were exacerbated with the appearance of new blisters on his limbs and trunk. Upon physical exam, we found tense bullae and post-bullous erosions on an erythematous base measuring 3-10 cm in diameter on trunk and limbs, with a positive Nikolsky sign (Figure 4).


Erosions on the oral and genital mucosa were also observed. The rest of the clinical examination was normal. Blood exams were carried out, which returned normal except for high eosinophilia at 2750/mm3. The histological examination showed a subepidermal blister with an inflammatory infiltrate of eosinophils. Direct immunofluorescence revealed a linear C3 pattern along the basement membrane; a diagnosis of BP was made. The imputability score was I5B4, highly suggestive of vaccine-induced BP. The patient required oral corticosteroid therapy at 30 mg/day (0.5 mg/kg/day) for a month, which led to a favorable outcome; a progressive degression was then started.

Case 4

A 50-year-old woman was admitted for the management of full-body erosions that had appeared 15 days after the administration of the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. She had no specific medical history. Clinical examination revealed extensive post-bullous erosions, especially on the trunk, back, and scalp (covering 75% of the skin area), with a positive Nikolsky sign (Figure 5).


She had no mucosal involvement. Histological examination showed a superficial epidermal blistering process with intact basal layer and intraepidermal eosinophils. Direct immunofluorescence showed intracellular IgG and C3, and indirect immunofluorescence was positive for anti-intercellular substance antibodies, indicating foliaceous pemphigus. The pharmacovigilance investigations determined a causality score of I5B4 for the vaccine, highly suggestive of a diagnosis of vaccine-induced pemphigus. The patient was put on oral corticosteroid therapy at 65 mg/day (1 mg/kg/day), with a complete resolution of lesions after only three weeks of treatment.

Case 5

A 58-year-old woman with a 10-year history of depression treated by sertraline presented one month after the administration of the first dose of the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine with erosions all over her body, necessitating hospitalization. Physical examination revealed extensive erosive lesions on her face, trunk, abdomen, back, buttocks, and both legs (Figure 6).


She also had erosions on the oral and genital mucosa. A histological examination of an abdominal lesion revealed intraepidermal vesicle with acantholysis, and diffuse perivascular dermal lymphocytic and eosinophilic infiltration. Direct immunofluorescence demonstrated deposit of IgG and C3 on epidermal cell surface membranes. Based on these findings, a diagnosis of pemphigus Vulgaris was made. The imputability of both the vaccine and sertraline was studied and the investigations implicated the vaccine. The patient’s condition improved with corticosteroid therapy at 55 mg/day (1 mg/kg/day). She is still scheduled to have her booster shot.

Table 1 summarizes the data of the described patients with new-onset AIBD following COVID-19 vaccination.

Patients Age in years/sex Implicated vaccine Onset time AIBD Mucosal involvement Skin surface affected Eosinophils count Treatment
Patient 1 51/M Second dose of Oxford AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine 7 days Bullous pemphigoid Yes 70% 3900/mm3 Corticosteroid therapy 0.5 mg/kg/day
Patient 2 54/F First dose of Oxford AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine 3 days Bullous pemphigoid Yes 30% 2200/mm3 Dermocorticoids
Patient 3 68/M Second dose of Oxford AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine 7 days Bullous pemphigoid Yes 50% 2750/mm3 Corticosteroid therapy 0.5 mg/kg/day
Patient 4 50/F Second dose of Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine 15 days Foliaceus pemphigus No 75% 500/mm3 Corticosteroid therapy 1 mg/kg/day
Patient 5 58/F First dose of Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine 1 month Pemphigus Vulgaris Yes 80% 850/mm3 Corticosteroid therapy 1 mg/kg/day


The onset of AIBD may be generated by a variety of factors, mainly by creating a hyper-stimulated state of the immune system [1]. Vaccines form a substantial component of the environmental factors that affect the immune system. The combination of a genetically predisposed status in an individual with a hyper-stimulated state of the immune system may trigger an AIBD. Cross-reactivity due to the resemblance between immunogenic proteins on the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus membrane and human extracellular molecules might be a plausible trigger [4].

BP is characterized by the appearance of tense blisters on an erythematous base and the existence of circulating IgG against BP180 and BP230 antigens of hemidesmosomes [5]. However, the role of vaccines in the onset of BP is not completely elucidated. The main mechanism by which vaccines, especially inactivated vaccines (such as the Oxford AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine in our cases), provide immunity involves the humoral pathway by the stimulation of B-lymphocytes, leading to the production of antibodies against the structural proteins [6]. Moreover, the inflammation caused by vaccination may lead to a disruption of the basement membrane, followed by the subsequent production of anti-basement membrane-specific antibodies [7]. Only a few cases of BP following vaccination have been reported in the literature in adults and children [8]. Based on our observations and a review of the literature [9], the induced BP is characterized by large bullae, a positive Nikolsky sign, mucosal involvement, and high eosinophil count, which were all found in our patients.

In the case of pemphigus, the circulating autoantibodies bind to transmembrane proteins involved in desmosome assembly (desmogleins), leading to acantholysis [10]. In addition to the mechanism of molecular mimicry, mRNA vaccines (such as the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, which had been administered to our patients with pemphigus) may give rise to a cascade of immunologic events, ultimately leading to aberrant activation of the innate and acquired immune system [11]. This may be particularly true in young women, due to the overexpression of X-linked genes that mediate the antiviral response and the stimulatory effect of estrogen on the immune system. Our pemphigus patients were all female [12].

Kasperkiewicz et al. investigated the link between vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 and the evolution of autoimmunity by testing serum samples for autoantibodies to the main immunobullous autoantigens (desmoglein 1, desmoglein 3, envoplakin, BP180, BP230, and type VII collagen) on 12 seropositive post-COVID-19 individuals and 12 seropositive healthy volunteers who received two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Although the results argued against a relationship between SARS-CoV-2 infection/vaccines and AIBDs, the theory of disease-triggering antibody cross-reactivity was highly suggested [13].


These vaccine-induced manifestations can probably be attributed to either cross-reactivity between autoantigens and the antigens injected with the vaccine, or simply to the effects of the adjuvants. We hypothesize that vaccination against COVID-19 triggers an immunological response in genetically predisposed individuals. This type of dysregulation is then reinforced by other autoimmune mechanisms. COVID-19 vaccine probably needs to be added to the list of vaccine triggers of AIBD.

However, given the complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection, the uncertainty of the causality between vaccinations and adverse events, and the rarity of these events, clinicians should still encourage full vaccination against COVID-19, including the completion of boosters in those with induced blisters after the first and second doses. A very interesting aspect we observed is that patients with new-onset BP had been administered inactivated COVID-19 vaccines while the patients with induced pemphigus were diagnosed following mRNA COVID-19 vaccinations. This might be a simple coincidence given that a case of BP following the mRNA COVID-19 vaccination has been recently reported.

What do you think?

Written by colinnew

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

FDA Says Novavax Covid-19 Shot Effective but Signals Safety Worry

FDA Says Novavax Covid-19 Shot Effective but Signals Safety Worry

Doctors File Lawsuit Claiming the FDA is Unlawfully Blocking Use of Ivermectin to Treat COVID-19

Doctors File Lawsuit Claiming the FDA is Unlawfully Blocking Use of Ivermectin to Treat COVID-19