colinnew
In October 2020, Dr. Andrew Hill was tasked to report to the WHO on the dozens of new studies from around the world suggesting that ivermectin could be a remarkably safe and effective treatment for COVID-19.
But on January 18th, 2021, Dr. Hill published his findings on a pre-print server. His methods lacked rigor, the review was low-quality and the extremely positive findings on ivermectin were contradicted (https://philharper.substack.com/p/professor-tied-to-altered-andrew) by the conclusion.
In the end, Dr. Hill advised that “Ivermectin should be validated in larger appropriately controlled randomized trials before the results are sufficient for review by regulatory authorities.”
One year on, this film (https://odysee.com/@The_BiRD_Group:3/2022.03.04-A-Letter-to-Andrew-Hill-V8_HD:e) recalls exactly what happened (https://drtesslawrie.substack.com/p/a-letter-to-dr-andrew-hill) from the perspective of somebody that experienced it first hand; Dr. Tess Lawrie; also featuring contributions from Dr. Pierre Kory and Dr. Paul Marik who worked closely with Dr. Hill during the same time frame.
