Summary
Background
Methods
Findings
Interpretation
Funding
Translation
Introduction
and post-approval studies have confirmed its safety in this age group.
However, very few studies estimating real-world effectiveness are available, and the published studies have all been done in the USA.
Furthermore, the effectiveness of the vaccine against the current dominant variant in Europe, omicron (B.1.1.529), might have changed compared with the context in which the previous randomised trials were done. Estimating the degree of protection in young children against infection and severe disease could inform authorities in the implementation and planning of public health interventions targeting both children and the community at large.
Methods
Study design and population
Procedures
Data were extracted on April 13, 2022, from both sources. The number of people in the non-vaccinated population, and without a SARS-CoV-2 notified infection, was obtained by subtracting the number of people who were vaccinated or with a previous SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis from the Italian resident population stratified by sex, age, and municipality of residence, as of Jan 1, 2021. The Italian resident population was derived from census data updated yearly by the National Institute of Statistics using the demographic balance from the population registry of each Italian municipality.
Outcomes
Equally, the surveillance system foresees that cases are recorded as hospitalised only if the hospitalisation is directly attributable to SARS-CoV-2 infection and not due to other causes.
Statistical analysis
,
we allowed 14 days from the time of vaccine inoculation to its immunological effect. Thus, children were classified as unvaccinated for the first 14 days after the first dose and as partly vaccinated for the first 14 days after the second dose. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of SARS-CoV-2 infections and severe COVID-19 for partly and fully vaccinated children compared with unvaccinated children were estimated using the negative binomial generalised linear mixed model, including geographical region of residence as the random effect and exposure measured in days as offset. We included two individual variables, sex and age (as categorical variables), as fixed effects. We used three contextual variables: (1) vaccination coverage at the municipal level in the population aged 30–50 years, split into two categories low (≤75%) and high (>75%); (2) level of urbanisation of the municipality of residence (urban, semi-urban, and rural) from the 2011 census, as reported by the National Institute of Statistics using the European Degree of Urbanisation classification;
and (3) the weekly regional incidence of COVID-19 in the general population. Vaccine effectiveness was calculated as (1 minus the IRR) multiplied by 100.
Adjusted vaccine effectiveness was estimated using the same model, including the frailty status (healthy, immunocompromised, or affected by a chronic pathology) as an additional covariate (information available only for people who were vaccinated through the national vaccination registry and obtained at the time of vaccination; appendix 2 p 3).
The negative binomial generalised linear mixed model was estimated using the R package glmmTMB.
We described the methods and presented findings according to the reporting guidelines for observational studies that are based on routinely collected health data (appendix 2 p 4).
Role of the funding source
Results
Not vaccinated group (n=1 768 497) | Partly vaccinated group (n=134 386) | Fully vaccinated group (n=1 063 035) | |
---|---|---|---|
Sex | |||
Male | 911 202 (51·5%) | 69 830 (52·0%) | 543 720 (51·1%) |
Female | 857 295 (48·5%) | 64 556 (48·0%) | 519 315 (48·9%) |
Age | |||
5 years | 301 157 (17·0%) | 14 060 (10·5%) | 95 788 (9·0%) |
6 years | 270 983 (15·3%) | 16 081 (12·0%) | 126 147 (11·9%) |
7 years | 262 018 (14·8%) | 18 063 (13·4%) | 139 516 (13·1%) |
8 years | 251 694 (14·2%) | 19 023 (14·2%) | 150 768 (14·2%) |
9 years | 248 813 (14·1%) | 20 495 (15·3%) | 164 652 (15·5%) |
10 years | 232 431 (13·1%) | 22 769 (16·9%) | 179 765 (16·9%) |
11 years | 201 401 (11·4%) | 23 895 (17·8%) | 206 399 (19·4%) |
Municipality vaccine uptake in 30-50-year-olds | |||
Low (≤75%) | 25 657 (1·5%) | 869 (0·6%) | 4966 (0·5%) |
High (>75%) | 1 742 840 (98·5%) | 133 517 (99·4%) | 1 058 069 (99·5%) |
Municipality urbanisation | |||
Urban | 593 602 (33·6%) | 50 181 (37·3%) | 393 357 (37·0%) |
Semi-urban | 869 499 (49·2%) | 64 878 (48·3%) | 515 086 (48·5%) |
Rural | 305 396 (17·3%) | 19 327 (14·4%) | 154 592 (14·5%) |
Number of infections | Person-days | Rate per 100 000 person-days | Crude IRR (95% CI) | Vaccine effectiveness (95% CI) | Adjusted vaccine effectiveness
(95% CI) |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Infection | ||||||
Unvaccinated group | 562 083 | 131 656 589 | 426·9 | 1 | NA | NA |
Partly vaccinated group | 83 441 | 25 860 465 | 322·7 | 0·76 (0·75-0·76) | 24·4 (23·9-24·9) | 27·4 (26·4-28·4) |
Fully vaccinated group | 121 232 | 51 699 305 | 234·5 | 0·55 (0·55-0·55) | 45·1 (44·8-45·4) | 29·4 (28·5-30·2) |
Severe disease | ||||||
Unvaccinated group | 510 | 89 464 006 | 0·57 | 1 | NA | NA |
Partly vaccinated group | 75 | 22 169 941 | 0·34 | 0·59 (0·46-0·76) | 40·7 (24·3-54·1) | 38·1 (20·9-51·5) |
Fully vaccinated group | 59 | 23 094 584 | 0·26 | 0·45 (0·34-0·59) | 55·2 (41·2-66·4) | 41·1 (22·2-55·4) |
Discussion
However, differences in the results between randomised trials and effectiveness studies have been previously reported for COVID-19 vaccination in other age groups. One of the several factors that could explain the differences observed is that the trial was done during a period of delta variant (B.1.617.2) dominance which was less transmissible and less able to evade immunity conferred by vaccination than the omicron variant, which accounted for more than 80% of infections in Italy during our study.
However, our estimates of vaccine effectiveness against infection coincide with the estimate reported in the USA in a previous study.
This prospective cohort study found a vaccine effectiveness against infection of 31% (95% CI 9–48) at 14–82 days after completion of the primary cycle in a sample of 1364 children aged 5–11 years, very similar to our estimate of 29·4% after a similar interval of 0–84 days after full vaccination. We found that vaccine effectiveness against infection peaked 0–14 days after full vaccination at 38%, declining to approximately 20% after 42 days. A similar pace in the decline of effectiveness against infection has been reported in an unpublished study.
This decline could be due to immunity waning, as described in the adult population vaccinated with mRNA vaccines,
but the decline in effectiveness appears to occur faster in 5–11-year-olds compared with 12–15-year-olds
and adults older than 18 years.
,
The first study, based on a sample of 9181 cases, found a vaccine effectiveness against emergency department and urgent care encounters of 46%,
slightly higher than our 41% estimate against severe disease. The second study reports a higher vaccine effectiveness against hospitalisations (68%) than that reported in our study, but a substantially shorter interval after vaccination (median 34 days) was used in this study,
compared with our investigation (median 71 days). However, results from these two studies
,
and our study overlap at the 95% CI level because of the low precision of estimates derived from the small number of severe events in this age group. In our study, most severe adverse events were non-ICU hospital admissions in surviving patients. Very few patients were admitted to an ICU or died, all of whom were unvaccinated.
,
,
including estimates derived from the same data sources such as the weekly analysis provided by the Italian National Institute of Health that shows a vaccine effectiveness during a period of omicron dominance in people aged 12 years and older of 44% against infection and around 71% against severe disease.
The reasons why vaccine effectiveness could be lower in 5–11-year-olds than in older age groups are still unclear. One explanation could be that the lower vaccine dose (10 μg) used in 5–11-year-olds induces a lower immune response compared with the full 30 μg dose used in children older than 12 years, adolescents, and adults.
An alternative explanation could be that the differences observed in severe disease are an artifact induced by a differential threshold of hospital admission associated with age.
,
However, we did not observe differences in the rates of hospital admission between children aged 5 years and those aged 11 years. The lower effectiveness observed in this age group should be interpreted alongside safety data in Italy from the existing pharmacovigilance systems,
as well as data from elsewhere, suggesting that adverse serious events caused by vaccination with paediatric BNT162b2 are extremely rare.
,
During this period, the high viral circulation characterised by a higher probability of asymptomatic infection in children could contribute to a larger proportion of hidden infections, with a subsequent increase in the rate of protective immune response also in unvaccinated children possibly contributing to an underestimation of vaccine effectiveness. Moreover, in a fast-evolving pandemic it is possible that these results are not generalisable to other contexts (eg, levels of viral circulation and emergence of new variants). More studies to evaluate vaccine efficacy in different contexts or with different dosage or administration timing could contribute to the evaluation of effective vaccination strategies in children.