This strongly suggests that the Pfizer Covid-19 injection is in fact causing a new form of “acquired immunodeficiency syndrome”, as suggested by a mountain of data made available by the UK Health Security Agency, as sepsis is caused by the failure of the immune system.
Here is the table of deaths in the Pfizer study from dose 1 (July 2020) to unblinding at 6 months (January 2021).
Sepsis/Septicemia results from the failure of the immune system to defeat a microbial (viral yeast or bacterial) infection.
Emphysematous cholecystitis is a relatively rare variant of acute cholecystitis with infection by gas-producing organisms. Diagnosis is made by detecting gas in the lumen or wall of the gallbladder with an ultrasound or CT scan. Unlike acute cholecystitis, emphysematous cholecystitis is more common in elderly and diabetic patients, and is often associated with perforation and death. – https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12768870/
It is the result of a failure of the immune system to defeat a microbial (viral yeast or bacterial) infection.
Acute cholecystitis. The most common cause of acute cholecystitis is gallstones. Other causes include typhoid fever and a malignant tumor that obstructs the bile duct system. The inflammation may be secondary to systemic sepsis. https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/emphysematous+cholecystitis
Acute cholecystitis is biliary sepsis, an inflammation of the gallbladder and bile ducts.
Here are the US deaths in 2020 by cause and the percentages for each cause.
The first thing that jumps out from these numbers is that the participants in the Pfizer study had a death rate of 17/19 per 21,921/6 per 6 months. While the general US population has a death rate of 111.2 per 21,923 per 6 months. So the participants in the Pfizer trial were more than 6x less likely to die than the general population.
The age profile of the original selection of participants is as follows
- 12-15 years old: 2260,
- 16-17 years: 754,
- 18-55 years: 25,427
- 56+ years: 17,879
So Pfizer must have ruled out a great many diseases to arrive at such an absurdly low mortality rate. Their study protocol reveals who they’ve excluded – https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04368728
The following is the incredible similarity between the unvaccinated Covid and cardiovascular death rates (10.5% and 26.3%) and those in the general population for 2020 (10.3% and 25.3%). So even though the numbers of deaths are small. They seem to be a very good representation of the reality in the general population.
If we now look at the rate of cardiovascular disease and the rate of sepsis in double vaccinates, we see (52.9% and 23.5% deaths) compared to the general population (and the unvaccinated) who only suffer from (26.3% and 1.1% or 25.3% and 0%).
And that’s where the toxicity of the Pfizer vaccine was exposed. The immune system is weakened to such an extent that people succumb to microbial infections and die 21 times more often than normal in the first 6 months after vaccination.
It can be argued that the number of deaths here is not large enough to draw valid statistical conclusions. In contrast, the unvaccinated numbers are very clearly representative and the numbers of participants in both groups are large enough to draw valid statistical conclusions.
When these numbers are combined with the weekly 5% impairment of immune response cataloged by the UKHSA from week 35-41 – https://theexpose.uk/2021/11/06/uk-gov-lying-and-hiding -the-fact-covid-19-vaccinated-are-developing-ade/ , one is beginning to see a picture suggesting that the vaccinees are developing an acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.
However you look at it, the numbers point to two major concerns that are supported today by a host of other statistical, mass media, clinical and anecdotal evidence.
These findings definitely require further research, specifically on immune system impairment and cardiovascular inflammation. But Pfizer has unblinded the placebo group and allowed them to be vaccinated at the end of the 6-month trial. So it’s hard to see how we can get any more data from Pfizer.
To be fair, we should be happy with the death data they have provided so far. Let’s face the facts. There are no ongoing long-term clinical studies on the safety of these vaccines. On the contrary. Indeed, it can be argued that the goal of the vaccine mandates lobbied by Pfizer is to eradicate any unvaccinated control group in order to avoid proper evaluation of vaccine side effects in the medium term.
To that end, here is an edited copy of a letter recently sent to the UK’s Scientific Advisory Group on
ALL WHILE THEY COME FOR THE KIDS
Dear members of SAGE
I am writing to inform you of an error in your scientific advice on Covid-19.
1. As you all know, the only acceptable scientific method for determining the safety or effectiveness of a medical intervention is to compare its effect on a randomly selected experimental group with a control group that is preferably the same size for statistical reasons .
In the Phase III clinical trials for Pfizer, there were 21,921 participants in the vaccinated group and 21,926 in the placebo group, the control group.
The control group, the placebo group, is the yardstick with which we measure the effectiveness of the intervention. Only by comparison with a control group can a researcher determine whether an intervention has a statistically significant effect on an experimental group, and the possibility of drawing an erroneous conclusion is mathematically and precisely determined. This AB comparison between intervention and control groups is called the Scientific Method.
Without a control group, the scientific method is therefore abandoned, we no longer follow science at all, and no statistically valid conclusion can be drawn from the intervention. Instead, science and its method have gone out the window and we are back into the dark ages of papal decrees.
2. The medium-term (1-3 years) safety or efficacy of the Adenovirus DNA vaccines and the lipid nanoparticle mRNA vaccines is not yet known as they have not been studied in the general population for more than 10 months.
In this country, the intervention group for these vaccines in the age group over 18 years now exceeds 90% of the population
Why has the Emergency Scientific Advisory Group failed to advise the UK Government to follow the scientific method and set up a proportionate control group that will not take the vaccines?
How can we assess the effectiveness of these vaccination measures if no such group exists?
How could a group of scientists fail so spectacularly not to follow not just “the science” but in fact every science in what is arguably the most significant UK medical intervention in the history of science and medical practice?
May I therefore, in the name of science, urge you to put your lab coats back on and advise the government of this country without delay to retain all currently unvaccinated people as members of a much too small, underrepresented, depleted and sadly less than proportionate control group, so that this whole vaccination experiment can actually come to a statistically valid and meaningful conclusion and to show the government and the British public and the world at large – what science really is.
In addition, if you are going to use children as laboratory rats for the benefit of adults and against the advice of the JCVI, please ensure that only 50% of them are vaccinated and that the remaining 50% are kept free from intervention as a appropriately sized control group so that we can learn from the horrific medical experiments that the government is carrying out on them.
With best regards,
A concerned reader
As final proof that Covid vaccines destroy the immune system, we now have the admission from the CDC in response to a request for information that they have no data on a person with natural immunity who was re-infected and passed the virus on to someone .
While the UKHSA has 450,992 records of people with dual vaccine immunity who have become infected with Covid in the past four weeks.